Case study / AMPO Nonprofit Solutions

Twenty years of expertise.
Not enough clients.

Amy Pokela knew more about nonprofit fundraising than almost anyone. The people who needed her could not find her. So we stopped writing about her and started publishing what she knows.

Client

AMPO Nonprofit Solutions

Engagement

Atlas Growth Partnership

Timeline

Twelve months

Scope

Research, publishing, website, outbound

01 / The problem

The expertise was never the issue.

Twenty years in nonprofit fundraising. Two years building AMPO into something new. Executive directors who worked with her did not go looking for anyone else.

The problem was everyone who had never worked with her. Search her category and you find agencies, templates, and slogans. You do not find the person who has sat across from three hundred boards.

A PDF is invisible to an answer engine.

The obvious move was a beautiful report. Gate it, run ads at it, collect emails. That is what everyone does, and it puts your best thinking somewhere no search engine and no AI can read it.

02 / The research

We did the research first.

Twenty six design thinking interviews. Executive directors, board members, and funders. Recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded.

Then triangulated. Against Amy's own five hundred and sixty six pages of discovery calls, and against the national data from BoardSource and the Fundraising Effectiveness Project. Four patterns held across all of it. Two of them got names: the 75/25 Rule, and the Marketing Mirage.

26

Interviews

Executive directors, board members, and funders. Recorded and coded, not surveyed.

566

Pages of discovery

Amy's own call notes, read against the interview data instead of alongside it.

2

National datasets

BoardSource and the Fundraising Effectiveness Project, to test what held outside the sample.

4

Findings that held

Patterns that showed up in all three sources. Everything else was cut.

The research said nonprofits reach for marketing because marketing feels safe and strategy does not.

It would have been very easy to do exactly that here. Pretty site, warm copy, call it a brand. We ran the research first, and the website was easy to write after that, because there was finally something specific to say.

03 / The publishing

Two publications. Two jobs.

One asset ended up doing five: lead magnet, AEO and SEO content, sales credibility, outbound opener, and the curriculum backbone for her learning studio.

Free
The Executive Brief.

The findings, designed and readable in one sitting. It became the lead magnet, and it is the thing the outbound engine sends. No gate on the ideas, only on the depth.

Paid
The Research Synthesis.

Full methodology, participant profile, and six strategic imperatives. The product for the buyer who has read the brief and wants the whole thing.

04 / The website

Sixteen pages. Seven templates.

Every research finding got its own crawlable page instead of being trapped inside a PDF. That is the whole trick, and almost nobody does it.

So when an executive director searches at eleven at night for why her board will not fundraise, she lands on our client. Not on a form. Not on nobody.

One page per finding

Four research findings, four indexable pages, each answering the question in the first paragraph. Built to be quoted by an answer engine, not just ranked.

Seven reusable templates

Sixteen pages built from seven patterns, so the site can grow without a rebuild every time.

Commerce and CRM wired in

Stripe for checkout, HubSpot for the CRM, Kajabi for the courses, Cloudflare at the edge.

Tracking live at launch

Conversion tracking running from day one, so the first month of traffic was data instead of a guess.

05 / The outbound engine

AI that reads her network.

It reads her existing contacts. It scores every one for fit. It works out which of the four findings will land with which person, and sends them that research for free.

Not a blast. A contribution. The first thing a stranger receives from Amy is something useful, with no ask attached.

Channel one

Personalized DMs

LinkedIn, written per contact against the finding most likely to land with them.

Channel two

Sequenced email

The same research, timed, so a person who did not open the first one still gets the right idea.

Channel three

The website

Answers the question when someone searches it at eleven at night, whether or not they ever got a message.

Every touch lands back on the contact record with its source attached, so we can see which finding is actually pulling and write more of that one.

06 / Why it worked

Research. Reporting. Website. Engine.

In that order. Every step after the first one was easier because the first one was done properly.

The usual order
Brand first.

Pick colors, write warm copy, launch, then try to work out what to say. The site looks finished and says nothing a buyer can use.

This order
Truth first.

Find out what is actually true, publish it where it can be found, then let the site and the outreach carry it. The copy writes itself once there is something specific to say.

07 / The client

Amy Pokela, AMPO Nonprofit Solutions.

Her work is original in a way I rarely see. Twenty years in the field, and two years building AMPO into something new: the AI enabled AMPO Flow planning engine, the Annual Giving Accelerator, and a library of teaching and video.

If you work in nonprofits, go look at what she is doing. Her Executive Brief is free.

Start here

Your expertise has the same problem.

Thirty minutes with me, not a salesperson. We find the one thing costing you the most time, and you leave knowing what it is whether or not you hire us.

Book a scope call See the rest of the work → Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Working nationally.